BridgeSafety

MON CO RT 19/25 vs INTERSTATE 80

Side-by-side bridge condition comparison from FHWA National Bridge Inventory data

Verdict

INTERSTATE 80 has a stronger Condition Score of 67/100 (B) compared to MON CO RT 19/25 at 25/100 (D). MON CO RT 19/25 carries 601K vehicles daily vs 550K for INTERSTATE 80. Built 1930 vs 1955.

INTERSTATE 80 leads MON CO RT 19/25 on the Condition Score by 42 points — a wide gap. Multiple primary components likely differ between the two structures, often reflecting differences in age, maintenance history, or original construction quality.

For users tracking infrastructure trends, two bridges of similar age and traffic load with very different condition scores usually reflect the maintenance and rehabilitation pattern of the owning agencies rather than inherent differences in the structures themselves. The per-bridge pages list the owning agency and inspection history.

MetricMON CO RT 19/25INTERSTATE 80
Condition Score
Higher is better, 0-100 scale based on NBI ratings
25/100 (D)67/100 (B)*
Deck Condition
NBI rating 0-9 for the riding surface
4/97/9*
Superstructure3/97/9*
Substructure5/97/9*
Daily Traffic601K550K
Year Built19301955
Length15.4m94.5m
Structurally DeficientYesNo
StateWest VirginiaCalifornia

INTERSTATE 80 has a stronger Condition Score of 67/100 (B) compared to MON CO RT 19/25 at 25/100 (D). MON CO RT 19/25 carries 601K vehicles daily vs 550K for INTERSTATE 80. Built 1930 vs 1955.

Explore More

MON CO RT 19/25 full profile|INTERSTATE 80 full profile

Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2026.